I feel like the article titled "Bush's seven deadly environmental sins" is extremely bias. Clearly this person does not like president bush and does like our president elect, Barack Obama. I think that the editorial only focuses on the negative things that President Bush has done while the article "Bush to Protect Three Areas in Pacific" is not bias and only tells you the facts, and the facts are that Bush seems to be a very environmentally friendly to the ocean. he may have messed up with some of the other things that he promised to do but at least he’s initiating this movement with the saving the areas in the pacific ocean.
Something that we should keep in mind is that even though Obama has promised to do great things for our country, he is not superman and he may as well mess up just like President Bush did.